Can You Save Taxes by Moving Out of California?

Douglas Andersen, Tax Partner
February 23, 2021

The California individual income tax rate is the highest in the nation. Its corporate income and sales tax make the top ten. On top of this is a growing list of onerous local gross receipts and payroll taxes. There have even been hints of a first-of-its-kind state wealth tax.

Individuals and businesses feeling the California tax pinch are looking towards an exit from the state as the best option to relieve their tax burden. Before committing to a relocation, taxpayers must investigate the intricacies of California residency to truly verify the effect on their tax bill. This article explores these considerations.

The Problem: Does Relocation Really Save Taxes?

The method with which California determines taxable income and its aggressive auditing of residency causes tax saving difficulties for individuals leaving the state. Each of these issues is discussed below.

Nonresident income sourcing: A trap for the unwary

Individuals moving from California often find themselves still paying CA individual income tax. The answer as to why this happens lies in two bedrock principles of individual income tax. First, a state may tax 100% of a resident’s worldwide income (subject to credits for taxes paid to other states). Second, states may also tax a nonresident on income from sources in the state.

For example, an individual may move from California and continue to receive income from California real estate investments or a closely-held business that operates in California. There are even instances where one high earner in a married couple moves, leaving their spouse behind only to learn that community property rules throw their plan in disarray. Although the individual is no longer a California resident, California may still tax the individual on these types of California-source income. Therefore, if most of a taxpayer’s income is California sourced, the anticipated tax savings may not materialize.

Business operations control taxes

Businesses run into a similar difficulty. Taxpayers often think that reincorporating or establishing a token office in a low-tax jurisdiction will allow them to escape California corporate income taxes. Commercial domicile may be a relevant consideration—typically when selling certain intangibles (e.g., stock)—but for the most part, actual business activity drives where a corporation pays tax.

This is due to nexus laws that determine how much of a business’s income a state may tax. If the business operates across state lines, each state may tax only its fair slice of the pie. Rules for determining the size of the slice are called allocation and apportionment and are meant to roughly approximate the amount of business conducted in the state.

California, like many other states, uses a single sales factor apportionment formula. This means that the California formula for determining state taxable business income is: sales sourced to California divided by all sales.

What does this mean for the relocating business? If the business moves its facilities and employees outside California without changing the relative mix of California v. non-California sales, its California tax bill may remain static.

This of course, assumes that the business retains sufficient connection (nexus) with California to remain subject to its taxing jurisdiction – the following constitute “engaged in business” within California and require businesses to pay tax, per the California Revenue and Taxation Code, RTC § 23101:

  • The taxpayer is organized or commercially domiciled in the state
  • CA sales exceed the lesser of $500,000, or 25% of total taxpayer sales
  • CA real property and tangible personal property (TPP) exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 25% of total real property or TPP
  • Compensation paid in the state exceeds the lesser of $50,000 or 25% of total compensation paid

Of course, there are exceptions that may apply to different client situations. This is why it is vital for business leaders to sit down with their accountants to model how a move may affect their California tax liability.

The Solution: What Should You Know About Changing Tax Residence?

Taxpayers who decide to leave California for tax purposes should avoid two cardinal mistakes: (1) misunderstanding residency laws and (2) not genuinely moving.

Residency determinations involve personal questions of family and social connections; it should be no surprise that these audits can be extraordinarily invasive. But they can be straightforward for taxpayers who thoughtfully prepare a plan for exiting the state, establishing a new residence, and retaining key documentation. The latter is quite important; the types of documentation that auditors request years down the road tend to evaporate quickly.

California’s FTB Publication 1031 goes into detail on the guidelines for establishing residency in the state. Strength of ties, not number of ties, is what will determine residency (where you have the closest connections). Potential factors to consider include:

  • Amount of time spent in California vs outside the state
  • Location of spouse and children
  • Location of principal residence
  • State of driver’s license
  • State of vehicle registration
  • State where you maintain professional licenses
  • Location of bank that manages your accounts
  • Origination point of financial transactions
  • Location of your medical professionals and healthcare providers
  • Location of social ties (places of worship, social clubs – like country clubs, etc.)
  • Location of real property and investments
  • Permanence of work assignments in California

Each plan for changing residency will be unique. That said, a few examples of steps that one should consider in changing residency include: disposing of a California home (or converting to a rental), acquiring a new home, changing drivers licenses and vehicle registrations, registering to vote, forming relationships with new medical, financial, and other professionals, and joining social and civic organizations. Small details matter: some cases have turned on where the family pet lived or where cell phone calls originated.

Taxpayers anticipating large liquidity events, such as selling a business or stock holdings, often intend to change their residence before that event. In addition to verifying that a changing residency will save California taxes, these individuals also should take great care to follow through with their residency change well in advance of the liquidity event to ensure that the timing is clear.

Key Takeaways

  • California residents and businesses may significantly reduce state and local taxes by migrating to a more favorable jurisdiction.
  • Tax migration is not a panacea—each taxpayer should carefully evaluate whether a relocation actually reduces California taxes.
  • Individuals with California sourced income may remain subject to California tax even as a nonresident.
  • Due to California’s single sales factor apportionment, many businesses may not experience a California tax reduction from relocating operations.
  • Changing residency requires careful planning, execution, and documentation.
  • Residency changes should be considered well in advance of income-generating liquidity events.

If you are considering a move out of California, contact your HCVT tax professional or the tax professionals listed below. Our team can provide guidance and insights about the tax implications and key considerations individuals and businesses should address as they contemplate a change in residency.  

Professionals

Jump to Page

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy.